Canadian Association of Wound Care Home Search Disclaimer Français
   

Back to Research

     
   

WOUND SIZE

Lazarus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, Margolis DJ, Pecoraro RE, Rodeheaver G, Robson MC. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Arch Dermatol 1994;130:489-93.

Bohannon RW, Pfaller BA. Documentation of wound surface area from tracings of wound perimeters: Clinical Report on three techniques. Physical Therapy 1983; 63(10):1622-1624.

Majeske C. Reliability of wound surface area measurements. Physical Therapy 1992;72(2):138-41.

Brown-Etris M, Pribble J, LaBrecque J. Evaluation of two wound measurement methods in a multi-center, controlled study. Ostomy/Wound Management 1994;40(7):44-48.

Griffin JW, Tolley EA, Tooms RE, Reyes RA, Clifft JK. A comparison of photographic and transparency-based methods for measuring wound surface area. Physical Therapy 1993;73(2):117-22.

Bulstrode CJK Goode AW, Scott PJ. Stereophotogrammetry for measuring rates of cutaneous healing: a comparison with conventional techniques. Clinical Science 71: 437-443, 1986.

Schubert V, Zander M. Analysis of the measurement of four wound variables in elderly patients with pressure ulcers. Adv Wound Care. 9(4); 29-36, 1996.

Comparison of assessment tools that evaluate wound size

Mayrovitz HN, Smith J, and Ingram C. Comparisons of venous and diabetic plantar ulcer shape and area. Advances In Wound Care 1998;11(4):176-83.

Plassmann P, Melhuish JM, Harding KG. Methods of measuring wound size a comparative study. Wounds 1994;6(2):54-61.

Langemo DK, Melland H, Hanson D, Olson B, Hunter S, and Henly SJ. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques. Advances In Wound Care 1998;11(7):337-43.

Plassmann P. Measuring wounds...a guide to the use of wound measurement techniques. Journal Of Wound Care 1995;4(6):269-72.

Thomas AC, Wysocki AB. The healing wound: a comparison of three clinically useful methods of measurement. Decubitus 1990;3(1):18-25.

Xakellis GC, Frantz RA. Pressure ulcer healing: What is it? What influences it? How is it measured? Advances in Wound Care, 1997; 10(5):20-26.

WOUND APPEARANCE

Shea JD. Pressure sores. Classification and management. Clin Orthop 1975;112:89-100.

Maklebust J. Policy implications of using reverse staging to monitor pressure ulcer status. Adv Wound Care 1997;10(5):32-35.

Bates-Jensen B. Evaluating pressure sores: A new computerized tool. Nurs Homes 1998;47(4):58-60.

Bates-Jensen BM, McNees P. Toward an intelligent wound assessment system. Ostomy/Wound Management 1995;41(7A suppl):80s-5s.

Bates-Jensen BM, Vredevoe DL, Brecht M-L. Validity and reliability of the pressure sore status tool. Decubitus 1992;5(6):20-8.

Thomas DR, Rodeheaver GT, Bartolucci AA, Franz RA, Sussman C, Ferrell BA, Cuddigan J, Stotts NA, Maklebust J. Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. Advances in Wound Care 1997;10(5):96-101.

Sussman C, Swanson G. Utility of the Sussman wound healing tool in predicting wound healing outcomes in physical therapy. Advances in Wound Care 1997 10(5):74-77.

Sussman C, Bates-Jensen BM. Tools to measure wound healing. In: Wound care: A collaborative practical manual for PTs and RNs. C. Sussman & BM Bates-Jensen. Aspen Pub. 1998

Ferrell BA, Artinian BM, Sessing D. The Sessing scale for assessment of pressure ulcer healing. Journal American Geriatric Society 1995;43:37-40.

Krasner D. Wound healing scale, Version 1.0; a proposal. Advances in Wound Care 1997; 10(5):82-85.

Falanga V (1993) Venous ulceration. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 19: 764-771.

Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB. Validation of a diabetic wound classification system. Diabetes Care 21(5); 855-858, 1998.

Wagner FW. The dysvascular foot: a system for diagnosis and treatment. Foot & Ankle 2: 64-122, 1981.

Houghton PE, Kincaid CB, Campbell KE, Woodbury MG, Keast DH. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers. OstomyWound Management 2000;46(4):20-30.

Woodbury MG, Houghton PE, Campbell KE, Keast DH. The leg ulcer measurement tool: Can it detect change in wound appearance? OstomyWound Manage 47(11): 51, 2001.

Comparison of assessment tools that evaluate wound appearance

Thomas DR. Existing Tools: Are they meeting the challenges of pressure ulcer healing. Advances in Wound Care 1997; 10(5):86-90.

Woodbury, MG, Houghton PE, Campbell KE, DH Keast. Pressure ulcer assessment instruments: A critical appraisal. Ostomy/Wound Management 1999;45(5):42-55.

Back to Research
     
   

Please contact us at: cawc@sympatico.ca.

© CAWC 2003
Last modified:
March 19, 2003